The University of Tennessee Southern is accredited by the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). Initial full accreditation was granted in October of 2024 by the Accreditation Council of the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. CAEP’s mission is to advance equity and excellence in educator preparation through evidence-based accreditation that assures quality and supports continuous improvement to strengthen P-12 student learning.
CAEP Accountability Measures
The University of Tennessee Southern’s Educator Preparation Program prepares and reports on educators for initial licensure (no advanced licensure programs). The Accountability Measures that the EPP must report on and make data publicly available on an annual basis are: 1) Completer impact and effectiveness; 2) employer satisfaction and stakeholder involvement; 3) candidate competency at the time of program completion, and 4) ability of completers to be hired in positions for which they are prepared. This process allows us to make continuous improvements that will better prepare teacher candidates to serve our district partners and their K-12 students.
UTS Preparation Program’s Quality Assurance System
Quality Assurance System – How UT Southern assesses its Educator Preparation Program
Broad Assessment Grid – Assessments used to assess program success
Areas of Certification at UT Southern
Endorsement Area | TN Endorsement Code | Under-graduate | Post-Baccalaureate Student | Additional Endorsement | Job-Embedded Eligible |
Elementary Education K-5 | 120 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Physical Education | 420 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Secondary-Biology 6-12 | 126 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Secondary-English 6-12 | 159 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Secondary-History 6-12 | 133 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Secondary-Math 6-12 | 125 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Special Education – Interventionist K-8 | 144 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Special Education -Interventionist 6-12 | 145 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Measure 1: Completer Effectiveness. (R4.1)
Data must address: (a) completer impact in contributing to P-12 student-learning growth AND (b) completer effectiveness in applying professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions.
Tennessee Department of Education Annual Reports
- 2024 Annual Report (2022-2023)
- 2023 Annual Report (2021-2022)
- 2022 Annual Report (2020-2021)
- 2021 Annual Report (2019-2020)
TVAAS (Tennessee Value Added Assessment System)
TVAAS is the data tool used by the Tennessee Department of Education to measure student growth and achievement. The data are reported to the teacher each year and to the EPP preparing the teacher for a 3-year period after completion.
Provider Impact
- Teaching Effectiveness as Reported by the 2023 Educator Preparation Report Card
- Teaching Effectiveness as Reported by the 2022 Educator Preparation Report Card
- Teaching Effectiveness as Reported by the 2021 Educator Preparation Report Card
- Teaching Effectiveness as Reported by the 2020 Educator Preparation Report Card
Satisfaction Report Card
- 2024 Satisfaction Report Card
- 2023 Satisfaction Report Card
- 2022 Satisfaction Report Card
- 2021 Satisfaction Report Card
Completer Satisfaction Survey
2020-2023 Post Graduate Survey Data
Measure 2: Satisfaction of Employers and Stakeholder Involvement. (R4.2, R5.3, RA4.1)
- Data provided should be collected on employers’ satisfaction with program completers.
Employee Satisfaction Surveys: (Principal surveys sent out each year to principals with UT Southern graduates in their first 5 years)
Principal Surveys (3-year data)
Partnership Agreements
- Bedford County
- Clay County
- Fayetteville City
- Franklin County
- Giles County
- King’s Daughter’s School
- Lawrence County
- Lenoir City
- Lewis County
- Lincoln County
- Marshall County
- Maury County
- Moore County
- Rutherford County
- Tullahoma City
- Wayne County
- Williamson County
Employment First through Third Years:
- 2024 Annual Report (2022-2023)
- 2023 Annual Report (2021-2022)
- 2022 Annual Report (2020-2021)
- 2021 Annual Report (2019-2020)
Teacher Placement by District

Measure 3 (Initial): Candidate Competency at Completion. (R3.3)
- Data provided should relate to measures the EPP is using to determine if candidates are meeting program expectations and ready to be recommended for licensure. (E.g.: EPP’s Title II report, data that reflect the ability of EPP candidates to meet licensing and state requirements or other measures the EPP uses to determine candidate competency at completion.)
Praxis Pass Rates (Title 2):
- Traditional Pass Rates 2021-2022
- Traditional Pass Rates 2022-2023
- Traditional Pass Rates 2023-2024
- Alternative Pass Rates 2022-2023 (First year for job-embedded program)
- Alternative Pass Rates 2023-2024
Candidate Assessment:
- 2021 Candidate Assessment-Annual Report
- 2022 Candidate Assessment-Annual Report
- 2023 Candidate Assessment-Annual Report
- 2024 Candidate Assessment-Annual Report
Candidate Profile:
- 2021 Candidate Profile-Annual Report
- 2022 Candidate Profile-Annual Report
- 2023 Candidate Profile-Annual Report
- 2024 Candidate Profile-Annual Report
Measure 4: Ability of Completers to be Hired (in positions for which they have prepared).
- Data provided may come from various sources, including state or EPP collected data related to completers’ employment in teaching positions for which they were prepared.
Competency of Completers:
- 2024 Annual Report (2022-2023)
- 2023 Annual Report (2021-2022)
- 2022 Annual Report (2020-2021)
- 2021 Annual Report (2019-2020)
- Dispositions (3-year report)
Employment/Retention:
- 2024 Annual Report (2022-2022)
- 2023 Annual Report (2021-2022)
- 2022 Annual Report (2020-2021)
- 2021 Annual Report (2019-2020)
Provider Impact:
- 2024 Annual Report (2021-2022)
- 2023 Annual Report (2021-2022)
- 2022 Annual Report (2020-2021)
- 2021 Annual Report (2019-2020)
Educator Disposition of the Effective Educator
The School of Education has identified nine educator dispositions with specific indicators that the effective professional educator displays. The following are desirable dispositions, from the Educator Disposition Assessment by Almerico, Johnston, and Wilson (2017), that candidates will be expected to demonstrate by the completion of their program to:
Demonstrates Effective Oral Communication Skills
- Demonstrates strong professional oral communication skills as evidenced by using appropriate language, grammar, and word choice for the learning environment
- Varies oral communication as evidenced by encouraging participatory behaviors
- Communicates at an age-appropriate level as evidenced by explaining content-specific vocabulary
Demonstrates Effective Written Communication Skills
- Communicates respectfully and positively with all stakeholders as evidenced by fostering conventional responses
- Demonstrates precise spelling and grammar
Demonstrates professionalism
- Responds promptly to communications and submits all assignments
Consistently exhibits punctuality and attendance - Maintains professional boundaries of ethical standards of practice
- Keeps inappropriate personal life issues out of classroom/workplace
- Functions as a collaborative group member as evidenced by high levels of participation towards productive outcomes
Demonstrates a positive and enthusiastic attitude
- Actively seeks solutions to problems without prompting or complaining
- Tries new ideas/activities that are suggested
- Demonstrates an appropriately positive affect with students as evidenced by verbal and non-verbal cues
Demonstrates preparedness in teaching and learning
- Accepts constructive feedback as evidenced by implementation of feedback as needed
- Learns and adjusts from experience and reflection as evidenced by improvements in performance
- Comes to class planned and with all needed materials
- Alters lessons in progress when needed as evidenced by ability to change plan mid-lesson to overcome the deficits
Exhibits an appreciation of and value for cultural and academic diversity
- Embraces all diversities as evidenced by implementing inclusive activities and behaviors with goals of transcendence
- Creates a safe classroom with zero tolerance of negativity to others as evidenced by correcting negative student behaviors
Collaborates effectively with stakeholders
- Demonstrates flexibility as evidenced by providing considered responses and accepts majority consensus
- Maintains a respectful tone at all times, even during dissent as evidenced by not interrupting or talking over others
- Proactively shares teaching strategies as evidenced by productive collaboration
Demonstrates self-regulated learner behaviors/takes initiative
- Recognizes own weaknesses as evidenced by seeking solutions before asking for support
- Researches and implements most effective teaching styles as evidenced by citing works submitted
Exhibits the social and emotional intelligence to promote personal and educational goals/stability
- Demonstrates appropriate maturity and self-regulation as evidenced by remaining calm when discussing sensitive issues
- Demonstrates perseverance and resilience (grit) as evidenced by tenacious and determined ability to persist through tough situations
- Demonstrates sensitivity to feelings of others as evidenced by compassionate and empathetic social awareness